Skip to main content

CopyCat Modi will fail to do much good for India

Today I saw the launch of new scheme of Narendra Modi which was named "Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana". But I could not find anything  in his new scheme to praise for. I agree with congressman who were saying that it is repacking of their Manmohan Govt.'s scheme. Already a concept of no frill account was there and the new scheme has not made any thing big for poor. B.J.P. is crying more for its every step to garner public support and bring its policies to public notice for coming election like saying we are doing so much for nation. 
In his independence day speech Modi said about making India a hub for electronic goods which was already a plan made by Manmohan Govt. and also acted upon. 
In union budget of Modi Govt., there was hardly any plan for rural area modernization. Modi wants to build 100 smart cities while the rural India is facing lot many problems. Then how justifiable it is to spend more money on cities when 68 percent of population resides in rural areas. 
Idea of soil testing and soil health card isn't new. Even idea of more crop per drop is not new. Modi is a good speaker and hence make big buzz by quoting these old ideas which are the needs and are already in practice but not known to common man and only known to technical person. Hence common man feel that Modi is doing something new and great for India.
If you look at ground reality of how much implementation is happening on these ideas then you find zero work on soil health card and his other ideas in his 100 days plan.
Even Modi failed to see the fact that India has federal structure and Agriculture is a state subject. Hence soil health card can not be issued by central govt, and central govt. can only give fund or request 29 states to issue soil health card to farmers in their respective states.Even state govt.s can not afford to do free soil testing due to poor financial conditions of many states. Further Modi wants the respective states to tell the farmer which crop is suitable for his soil and what should be the input application rate to grow more. But he does not know that already states have deficiencies in their agricultural extension system and does not have enough man power at work to tell farmers all this matter.  
Already we have operation of water markets and micro irrigation subsidy scheme to promote water efficiency and hence Modi has nothing more to do to make his quote "More crop per drop of water" work on ground.

Rather than scrapping Planning Commission he could reform this body. New body which he want to bring into picture for sure will not differ from Planning Commission. Planning Commission had no constitutional status and added to it members had no tenure and there was no eligibility criteria for becoming a member of planning commission. Why Modi did not think of reforming these anomalies with this great organization ? Planning Commission is required to plan the economic agenda for a planned economy. Modi wants to run the whole work of planning from his PMO which is not possible and it will make it sure that PMO misuse its powers. Even Ministry of Finance is not capable by itself to do task of planning. Now after scrapping the Planning Commission Modi didn't declare which constitutional body will take care of Five year plans ?

Modi will have to answer this question either today or after loosing his next Lok Sabha election ?


Popular posts from this blog

Where is my job?
Every economy is required to maintain the full employment level of resources but very often economies fail to achieve it. The most common reasons are policy lacunae from Government. But what is unheard off is that irrational choices is the number one reason to name.This seems ridiculous at first site because economists assume rationality to prevail everywhere. But just think off a bureaucrat who lacks formal training in economics but is always tasked with preparing the draft of Government's proposed legislation/policy framework on creating employment in economy. The bureaucrat's lack of knowledge often reflects in the policy lacunae that governments make. The first one is that bureaucrat does not believe in power of market to allocate resources, including human capital, to various sectors/activities in efficient way and rather has firm belief that government's bureaucratic mechanism is the most efficient one for such task. This irrational belief is reflect…

Conditions necessary for Micro-credit to be a successful poverty reduction tool

Poverty reduction remains a daunting task for policy makers’ world over. Out of quiver of many policies prescriptions available to policy makers is microcredit among the latest. However as it is noted by all the scholars worldwide that no single policy prescription is panacea  for reducing poverty and hence microcredit should be one of the policy prescription along with other in the poverty reduction programme.                 To make microcredit a successful poverty reduction tool we must use it simultaneously with other poverty reduction tools such as 1. Subsidised food grain distribution: Since poor people spend around 80 percent of their income on food and hence making available subsidised food grains will go a long way in increasing the purchasing power of the poor. This will further protect the poor from high market prices of food grains and will enable them to make prompt payment instalments to service their loans. 2.Skill development of poor people: Since poor people lack e…

The Supermarket Revolution is a Two-Edged Sword

The SupermarketRevolution in Developing Countries Policies for “Competitiveness withInclusiveness”, an article by Thomas Reardon and Ashok Gulati discusses the impact on each segment. 1. Supermarkets are having benefits of scale economies and low cost structure due to their business model which they pass on to consumers in the form of lower prices of goods for no change in quality. Given the fact that food products constitutes major share of sales in supermarket and are having inelastic supply as well as demand, lower prices for same/similar quality goods provides higher satisfaction and welfare to consumers. This also benefits economy in fighting inflationary tendencies. 2. For retailers in unorganized sectors, the authors say that the share of the unorganized retailers declines at different rates in different countries. From the point of view of an economy this is a good signal because with increasing formal sector in economy it becomes easy for government to regulate markets, taxati…