Skip to main content

CopyCat Modi will fail to do much good for India

Today I saw the launch of new scheme of Narendra Modi which was named "Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana". But I could not find anything  in his new scheme to praise for. I agree with congressman who were saying that it is repacking of their Manmohan Govt.'s scheme. Already a concept of no frill account was there and the new scheme has not made any thing big for poor. B.J.P. is crying more for its every step to garner public support and bring its policies to public notice for coming election like saying we are doing so much for nation. 
In his independence day speech Modi said about making India a hub for electronic goods which was already a plan made by Manmohan Govt. and also acted upon. 
In union budget of Modi Govt., there was hardly any plan for rural area modernization. Modi wants to build 100 smart cities while the rural India is facing lot many problems. Then how justifiable it is to spend more money on cities when 68 percent of population resides in rural areas. 
Idea of soil testing and soil health card isn't new. Even idea of more crop per drop is not new. Modi is a good speaker and hence make big buzz by quoting these old ideas which are the needs and are already in practice but not known to common man and only known to technical person. Hence common man feel that Modi is doing something new and great for India.
If you look at ground reality of how much implementation is happening on these ideas then you find zero work on soil health card and his other ideas in his 100 days plan.
Even Modi failed to see the fact that India has federal structure and Agriculture is a state subject. Hence soil health card can not be issued by central govt, and central govt. can only give fund or request 29 states to issue soil health card to farmers in their respective states.Even state govt.s can not afford to do free soil testing due to poor financial conditions of many states. Further Modi wants the respective states to tell the farmer which crop is suitable for his soil and what should be the input application rate to grow more. But he does not know that already states have deficiencies in their agricultural extension system and does not have enough man power at work to tell farmers all this matter.  
Already we have operation of water markets and micro irrigation subsidy scheme to promote water efficiency and hence Modi has nothing more to do to make his quote "More crop per drop of water" work on ground.

Rather than scrapping Planning Commission he could reform this body. New body which he want to bring into picture for sure will not differ from Planning Commission. Planning Commission had no constitutional status and added to it members had no tenure and there was no eligibility criteria for becoming a member of planning commission. Why Modi did not think of reforming these anomalies with this great organization ? Planning Commission is required to plan the economic agenda for a planned economy. Modi wants to run the whole work of planning from his PMO which is not possible and it will make it sure that PMO misuse its powers. Even Ministry of Finance is not capable by itself to do task of planning. Now after scrapping the Planning Commission Modi didn't declare which constitutional body will take care of Five year plans ?

Modi will have to answer this question either today or after loosing his next Lok Sabha election ?


Popular posts from this blog

The Supermarket Revolution is a Two-Edged Sword

The SupermarketRevolution in Developing Countries Policies for “Competitiveness withInclusiveness”, an article by Thomas Reardon and Ashok Gulati discusses the impact on each segment. 1. Supermarkets are having benefits of scale economies and low cost structure due to their business model which they pass on to consumers in the form of lower prices of goods for no change in quality. Given the fact that food products constitutes major share of sales in supermarket and are having inelastic supply as well as demand, lower prices for same/similar quality goods provides higher satisfaction and welfare to consumers. This also benefits economy in fighting inflationary tendencies. 2. For retailers in unorganized sectors, the authors say that the share of the unorganized retailers declines at different rates in different countries. From the point of view of an economy this is a good signal because with increasing formal sector in economy it becomes easy for government to regulate markets, taxati…

Should national governments introduce minimum wages or should they leave it up to the market to decide on wages?

I support Market to determine wage rates. Facts and reasoning for justifying my point are following. Minimum wage laws were invented in Australia and New Zealand for purpose of guaranteeing the minimum standard of living for unskilled workers. Minimum wage laws can set the minimum wages but can’t guarantee job. In practice they are often set for low skilled workers. (Gorman) . The International Labour Office in Geneva, Switzerland reports that some 90% of countries around the world have legislation supporting a minimum wage. The minimum wage in countries that rank within the lowest 20% of the pay scale is less than $2 per day, or about $57 per month. The minimum wage in the countries that represent the highest 20% of the pay scale is about $40 per day, or about $1,185 per month. (Smith). For USA, Minimum wage in 1968 was $1.60 per hour while it was $7.21 per hour on a 1996 constant dollar scale and minimum wage in 1996 was $4.75 per hour. This shows that rise in minimum wages have not …

Conditions necessary for Micro-credit to be a successful poverty reduction tool

Poverty reduction remains a daunting task for policy makers’ world over. Out of quiver of many policies prescriptions available to policy makers is microcredit among the latest. However as it is noted by all the scholars worldwide that no single policy prescription is panacea  for reducing poverty and hence microcredit should be one of the policy prescription along with other in the poverty reduction programme.                 To make microcredit a successful poverty reduction tool we must use it simultaneously with other poverty reduction tools such as 1. Subsidised food grain distribution: Since poor people spend around 80 percent of their income on food and hence making available subsidised food grains will go a long way in increasing the purchasing power of the poor. This will further protect the poor from high market prices of food grains and will enable them to make prompt payment instalments to service their loans. 2.Skill development of poor people: Since poor people lack e…