Skip to main content

Should national governments introduce minimum wages or should they leave it up to the market to decide on wages?

I support Market to determine wage rates. Facts and reasoning for justifying my point are following.
Minimum wage laws were invented in Australia and New Zealand for purpose of guaranteeing the minimum standard of living for unskilled workers. Minimum wage laws can set the minimum wages but can’t guarantee job. In practice they are often set for low skilled workers. (Gorman) . The International Labour Office in Geneva, Switzerland reports that some 90% of countries around the world have legislation supporting a minimum wage. The minimum wage in countries that rank within the lowest 20% of the pay scale is less than $2 per day, or about $57 per month. The minimum wage in the countries that represent the highest 20% of the pay scale is about $40 per day, or about $1,185 per month. (Smith).
For USA, Minimum wage in 1968 was $1.60 per hour while it was $7.21 per hour on a 1996 constant dollar scale and minimum wage in 1996 was $4.75 per hour. This shows that rise in minimum wages have not been keeping pace with inflation. (Federal Minimum Wage Rates, 1955–2013). Productivity of workers has risen between 1960 and 2000 but the wages have not kept pace with the increase in productivity. But US Government kept the minimum wage rates low in order to benefit the industrialist and petty shop owners. (Kulinski, 2013)But this benefit came at the cost of those who deserved to be receiving more. Although proportion of people working on minimum wage rate are just 5 percent of the population. (Smith) Hence there is no point in letting government set minimum hourly wages artificially low to benefit industrialist. Although the intentions of the US Government were not just to benefit but also to avoid losing jobs to foreign countries via outsourcing and shifting of factories to China due to concerns of high labour cost. (James A. Dorn, 2013).  
It is a law in most of the countries today that working below the minimum wage rate is a punishable offence. Hence even if someone is ready to work below the minimum wage rate voluntarily, he/she will not be able to do so. Hence to give liberty to people it is better to adopt market determined wage rate. Also there is cost of enforcing the minimum wage law which otherwise can be used to make poor’s better off by choosing market determined wage rate.
It has been proved for several countries over the years that minimum wage increase unemployment among the low skilled workers. (Gorman;Soundararajan, 2013). Market determined wage rates also encourages low skilled workers & students to acquire more skills and to employer an option to provide training and apprentice facilities for novice workers to enter lucrative skilled job market. (James A. Dorn, 2013)
There is always a fear with minimum wage laws that state may set the minimum wages at higher levels that labour supply starts to decline due to backward bending nature of supply curve. Such effects were visible in India when government started MGNREGA programme. (Vanitha S. M., 2011)

Federal Minimum Wage Rates, 1955–2013. (n.d.). Retrieved November 10, 2014, from
Gorman, L. (n.d.). "Minimum Wages", The concise Encyclopedia of Economics, Library of Economics and Liberty. Retrieved November 8, 2014, from
James A. Dorn, R. R. (2013, April 18). Abolish the Minimum Wage Full Debate- Intelligence Squared U.S. IntelligenceSquared Debates. London, United Kindom. Retrieved November 10, 2014, from
Kulinski, K. (2013, December 12). Staggering Minimum Wage Facts. Secular Talk Radio Network . Retrieved November 9, 2014, from
Smith, L. (n.d.). The Minimum Wage: Does It Matter? Retrieved November 10, 2014, from
Soundararajan, V. (2013, April 8). Minimum wages and enforcement in India: Inverted U-shaped employment effects. Retrieved November 8, 2014, from
Vanitha S. M., P. S. Srikanthamurthy (2011). An Economic Analysis of MGNREG programme in Mysore district of Karnataka. Agricultuarl Economics Research Review, 24, 414-422.


Popular posts from this blog

Where is my job?
Every economy is required to maintain the full employment level of resources but very often economies fail to achieve it. The most common reasons are policy lacunae from Government. But what is unheard off is that irrational choices is the number one reason to name.This seems ridiculous at first site because economists assume rationality to prevail everywhere. But just think off a bureaucrat who lacks formal training in economics but is always tasked with preparing the draft of Government's proposed legislation/policy framework on creating employment in economy. The bureaucrat's lack of knowledge often reflects in the policy lacunae that governments make. The first one is that bureaucrat does not believe in power of market to allocate resources, including human capital, to various sectors/activities in efficient way and rather has firm belief that government's bureaucratic mechanism is the most efficient one for such task. This irrational belief is reflect…

Conditions necessary for Micro-credit to be a successful poverty reduction tool

Poverty reduction remains a daunting task for policy makers’ world over. Out of quiver of many policies prescriptions available to policy makers is microcredit among the latest. However as it is noted by all the scholars worldwide that no single policy prescription is panacea  for reducing poverty and hence microcredit should be one of the policy prescription along with other in the poverty reduction programme.                 To make microcredit a successful poverty reduction tool we must use it simultaneously with other poverty reduction tools such as 1. Subsidised food grain distribution: Since poor people spend around 80 percent of their income on food and hence making available subsidised food grains will go a long way in increasing the purchasing power of the poor. This will further protect the poor from high market prices of food grains and will enable them to make prompt payment instalments to service their loans. 2.Skill development of poor people: Since poor people lack e…

The Supermarket Revolution is a Two-Edged Sword

The SupermarketRevolution in Developing Countries Policies for “Competitiveness withInclusiveness”, an article by Thomas Reardon and Ashok Gulati discusses the impact on each segment. 1. Supermarkets are having benefits of scale economies and low cost structure due to their business model which they pass on to consumers in the form of lower prices of goods for no change in quality. Given the fact that food products constitutes major share of sales in supermarket and are having inelastic supply as well as demand, lower prices for same/similar quality goods provides higher satisfaction and welfare to consumers. This also benefits economy in fighting inflationary tendencies. 2. For retailers in unorganized sectors, the authors say that the share of the unorganized retailers declines at different rates in different countries. From the point of view of an economy this is a good signal because with increasing formal sector in economy it becomes easy for government to regulate markets, taxati…