Skip to main content

The Supermarket Revolution is a Two-Edged Sword

The SupermarketRevolution in Developing Countries Policies for “Competitiveness withInclusiveness”, an article by Thomas Reardon and Ashok Gulati discusses the impact on each segment.
1. Supermarkets are having benefits of scale economies and low cost structure due to their business model which they pass on to consumers in the form of lower prices of goods for no change in quality. Given the fact that food products constitutes major share of sales in supermarket and are having inelastic supply as well as demand, lower prices for same/similar quality goods provides higher satisfaction and welfare to consumers. This also benefits economy in fighting inflationary tendencies.
2. For retailers in unorganized sectors, the authors say that the share of the unorganized retailers declines at different rates in different countries. From the point of view of an economy this is a good signal because with increasing formal sector in economy it becomes easy for government to regulate markets, taxation and food quality.
3. At a time when supermarkets have become too large to regulate abuse of power is a widespread problem. For example, Wal-Mart globally sold goods worth $473.1 billion for financial year 2014 which is more than agricultural GDP of India ($ 334 billion).This was also evident in case of Wal-Mart wherein it paid $25 million to lobby senators of US and India to gain greater access to market in India[1] (Ramanna & Muthuram, 2013). According to report submitted to EU, supermarkets hold a major share in national food market of Europe and this power concentration in hands of few players leads to abuse of power affecting consumers and suppliers (Consumers International, 2012). Though author does not talk about the abuse of power by multinational supermarket chains but indirectly discusses it in the form of challenges supermarket poses to suppliers.                                                                              Author says “Supermarkets pose a challenge to suppliers by pressing them for consistency and quality of supplies which in turn requires higher investment by the processors, market intermediaries and farmers to upgrade the standards of their products and services”. For an underdeveloped or developing country it is good to some extent that this will alleviate the problem of low quality standards in those countries but at whose cost? For large size suppliers and market intermediaries, it is possible to follow at ease the standards that supermarket demands but for small players it becomes increasingly difficult to survive as supermarket grab bigger share of the market.              
Farmers need to invest heavily due to poor public good provisioning in developing countries that makes transaction cost of entering the commercialized markets increasingly high for subsistence farmers (Pingali, Khwaja, & Meijer, 2005). If government does not help theses small farmers with subsidies to invest then their existence is threatened. Hence giving the supermarket power to decide the livelihood of small farmers is not good in context of food and livelihood security.
I conclude here with my words that “benefit edge of the sword is blunted while cost edge is too sharp to harm the nations”.
REFERENCES
Consumers International. (2012, July 17). The relationship between supermarkets and suppliers - summary. Retrieved from http://www.consumersinternational.org/media/1035307/summary,%20the%20relationship%20between%20supermarkets%20and%20suppliers.pdf
Pingali, P., Khwaja, Y., & Meijer, M. (2005, October). Commercializing Small Farms: Reducing Transaction Costs. Italy. Retrieved December 04, 2014, from ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/008/af144e/af144e00.pdf
Ramanna, K., & Muthuram, V. (2013, September ). "Wal-Mart Lobbying in India?" Harvard Business School Case 114-023.



[1]Lobbying senators is a punishable offence in India. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dear readers
As I have been requested by my juniors from various campuses of Karnataka that I should provide reading and practice material online to all for benefit of juniors. Hence I am providing link to get material online. Following is the link of my personal website on which I have uploaded the book.
http://gouravkumarvani.co.in/

Should national governments introduce minimum wages or should they leave it up to the market to decide on wages?

I support Market to determine wage rates. Facts and reasoning for justifying my point are following. Minimum wage laws were invented in Australia and New Zealand for purpose of guaranteeing the minimum standard of living for unskilled workers. Minimum wage laws can set the minimum wages but can’t guarantee job. In practice they are often set for low skilled workers. (Gorman) . The International Labour Office in Geneva, Switzerland reports that some 90% of countries around the world have legislation supporting a minimum wage. The minimum wage in countries that rank within the lowest 20% of the pay scale is less than $2 per day, or about $57 per month. The minimum wage in the countries that represent the highest 20% of the pay scale is about $40 per day, or about $1,185 per month. (Smith). For USA, Minimum wage in 1968 was $1.60 per hour while it was $7.21 per hour on a 1996 constant dollar scale and minimum wage in 1996 was $4.75 per hour. This shows that rise in minimum wages have not …